WARD also testified that he and his son, William, operate a legal E-Bay business from that address with an associated PayPal account. See Franks Decl. (Doc. 59-2) Ward Depo., pp. 20-22; p. 29, Lines 4-22. The E-Bay and PayPal account had an e-mail address which was accessible to William. A reasonable person might conclude that any of those persons had access to WARD’S computers and therefore his e-mail addresses and online personas. A reasonable person could infer that of the people living with WARD, William certainly had access to WARD’S computers, his e-mail addresses and E-Bay account and thus, could have sent the offending piracy software in messages and posted on the Internet as well as selling DISH Network-related products using the E-Bay account and WARD’S monikers.

He also says its illegal to post files for distribution. That is not going to help anyone in court. Docs attached.

Attached Files

	Echo V Ward, Ward Response To Motion Judgment.pdf (55.9 KB, 25 views)
	Echo V Ward Memorandum To Judgment Motion.pdf (46.2 KB, 12 views)

__________________

Please don't PM me with fta related questions, ask them in open forums so others can benefit from them too.

Ya anything to put resonable doubt in the minds of a jury, wasnt me might of been my son, jury says hhmm there is that slight chance. of course if he walks they go an arrest the son, but what the hey he is younger will do better in jail lol...

Who needs enemies with a father like that.

__________________

Please don't PM me with fta related questions, ask them in open forums so others can benefit from them too.